Visual storytelling individual news analysis

 BIMBAGU

GROUP 3

                                                 NEWS HEADLINE

1.Does the image accurately represent the headline's message.

The image shows a river with murky brown water, which could be related to sand mining. The headline mentions sand mining in Adidome disrupting water treatment and GWL issuing an appeal. While the image does not directly show sand mining or its effects on water treatment, it does depict a polluted river, which could be a consequence of sand mining. Therefore, the image partially represents the headline's message but does not provide explicit evidence of the issue.

2.What emotions does the image evoke.[Does it create urgency,sympathy or controversy]

The image depicts an emotion of urgency caused.  

The water looks like tea, which is ready to be taken. All you need is a cup, and you're off to breakfast. It should not be so, knowing perfectly well that water is colorless. The image tells a different story.

It's not only the natural color that is lost, but nutrients are also lost, and living organisms such as fish have lost their habitat.

3.Is the image manipulated or biased. [Does it frame the story in a particular way]

The image appears to be a genuine representation of a polluted river, but its use in the context of the headline could be seen as framing the story in a particular way. The image's focus on the murky water and the natural surroundings may evoke an emotional response from the viewer, emphasizing the environmental impact of sand mining. However, without more context or information about the image's origin and manipulation, it's difficult to say for certain whether the image is biased or not.

4.How does composition affect storytelling.[ consider framing ,lighting and focus].

The image's composition, featuring a centered frame, natural lighting, and focused attention on the polluted river, effectively conveys the environmental impact of sand mining, supporting the headline's message and evoking an emotional response from the viewer.

5.Does the image add depth to the story or simply reinforce the headline.

The image mainly supports the headline without adding much depth to the story. While it shows a muddy water body consistent with the impact of sand mining, it lacks specific details or emotional resonance that would make the story more compelling.

6.Would a different image change the readers percerption of the news.

 Yes, a different image could definitely change the perception of the news. Images have a powerful impact on how we interpret information. For instance, if the image showed a close-up of polluted water, it might evoke a stronger sense of urgency and concern. Instead, an image of the sand mining operation could highlight the economic aspect of the issue.

7.How does the image compare to others covering the same story.

The image used in this story is relatively neutral and understated compared to others that might cover the same topic. It shows a calm river with some erosion on the banks but lacks any immediate or dramatic visual indicators of sand mining or its environmental impact.

In comparison to other possible images—such as photos showing active sand mining machinery, piles of sand, or visibly polluted water—this image does not convey the severity or urgency of the issue. Other images could show the direct human or environmental toll, such as damaged infrastructure, affected communities, or disrupted water treatment facilities, which would likely create a more powerful visual impact.

8.Is the image culturally or politically significant.[ Does it reflects societal biases].

Overall, the image serves as a visual representation of a concern environmental issue with significant cultural, political, and social implications.

GROUP MEMBERS 

OWUSU GYAN PHILIP

ERICA AMENYA

MABEL TORGBENYA

ASANTE DOMINIC 

ANGELA OSEI

SEFA

GERTRUDE